Agenda and minutes

Venue: The Thornton Room - Ground Floor, West Offices (G039). View directions

Contact: Jill Pickering 

Items
No. Item

1.

Declarations of Interest

At this point, Members are asked to declare:

 

·        any personal interests not included on the Register of Interests

·        any prejudicial interests or

·        any disclosable pecuniary interests

 

which they may have in respect of business on this agenda.

 

Minutes:

Members were asked to declare any personal interests not included on the Register of Interests, any prejudicial interests or any disclosable pecuniary interests which they might have in respect of business on the agenda.  No additional interests were declared.

2.

Public Participation

It is at this point in the meeting that members of the public who have registered to speak can do so.  The deadline for registering is 5.00pm on Friday 22 July 2016.  Members of the public can speak on agenda items or matters within the remit of the committee.

 

To register to speak please contact the Democracy Officer for the meeting, on the details at the foot of the agenda.

 

Filming, Recording or Webcasting Meetings

Please note this meeting may be filmed and webcast or audio recorded and that includes any registered public speakers, who have given their permission.  The broadcast can be viewed at http://www.york.gov.uk/webcasts  or, if sound recorded, this will be uploaded onto the Council’s website following the meeting.

 

Residents are welcome to photograph, film or record Councillors and Officers at all meetings open to the press and public. This includes the use of social media reporting, i.e. tweeting.  Anyone wishing to film, record or take photos at any public meeting should contact the Democracy Officer (whose contact details are at the foot of this agenda) in advance of the meeting.

 

The Council’s protocol on Webcasting, Filming & Recording of Meetings ensures that these practices are carried out in a manner both respectful to the conduct of the meeting and all those present.  It can be viewed at https://www.york.gov.uk/downloads/file/6453/protocol_for_webcasting_filming_and_recording_council_meetingspdf

 

 

Minutes:

It was reported that there had been no registrations to speak at the meeting under the Council’s Public Participation Scheme.

3.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 124 KB

To approve and sign the minutes of the meeting held on 9 May 2016.

Minutes:

Resolved:  That the minutes of the meeting held on 9 May 2016 be approved as a correct record and then signed by the Chair.

4.

Called-in Item: Better Bus Area Fund - Clarence Street Bus Improvement Scheme pdf icon PDF 202 KB

To consider the decisions made by the Executive Member for Transport and Planning at a Decision Session held on 9 June 2016 in relation to the above item, which has been called in by Councillors Flinders, Looker and D Myers in accordance with the Council’s Constitution.  A cover report is attached setting out the reasons for the call-in and the remit and powers of the Corporate and Scrutiny Management Policy and Scrutiny Committee (Calling-In) in relation to the call-in, together with the original report and the decisions of the Executive Member for Transport and Planning.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Members received a report which asked them to consider a decision made by the Executive Member for Transport and Planning on 9 June 2016 in respect of the Better Bus Area Fund – Clarence Street Bus Improvement Scheme.

 

Details of the Executive Member’s decision were attached at Annex A to the report and the original report to the Executive Member Decision Session on 9 June 2016, attached at Annex B.

 

In accordance with the arrangements for post decision scrutiny call-in, three Members (Councillors Flinders, Looker and D Myers) had called in the decision for the following reasons:

 

“(i)     The proposed scheme has involved no consultation

          with Guildhall’s ward councillors;

(ii)          The scheme commits significant public funds for very little change to the status quo, representing poor value for money;

(iii)        The revised scheme draws on two separate funding streams designed specifically to improve bus services; this scheme’s measures will make no improvements to bus services in the short to medium term, if at all; and

(iv)        The scheme provides no knock on benefits for motorists or cyclists following the removal of the extended two lane approach to the junction, the removal of the separate signalling for left turns into Lord Mayor’s Walk and the removal of the cycle lane and cyclist waiting area at the top of Clarence Street.”

 

Councillor Looker spoke on behalf of the Call-in Members.  She stated that the issues at this bottleneck junction had been ongoing for a long time and hence she was hopeful that a scheme would go forward.  She detailed the concerns of the call in Members regarding the proposals, as outlined in the reasons they had submitted.

 

Members questioned Councillor Looker in respect of issues raised in the reasons for the call in, including clarifying the situation regarding consultation that had taken place with Ward Members and residents on the new scheme and on the previous proposals.

 

The Executive Member for Planning and Transport spoke in response to the points made for the call-in of the decision.  He stated that he had understood that consultation had taken place on the original scheme.  He gave details of the proposed scheme and explained why it had been necessary to modify the original proposals because of issues in respect of the underground cabling that had been identified and which would have been costly to address as well as causing significant disruption.  The Executive Member stated that the proposed scheme was the best option with the funding that was available and that the bus companies were satisfied with the scheme.

 

The Executive Member was questioned about aspects of the scheme, including the signal phasing and the extent to which bus services would be improved. Members also queried whether the scheme provided value for money or whether the funding would be better spent elsewhere.  The Executive Member stated that he did believe that the scheme provided value for money and that the benefits of the revised scheme were in line with those of the original scheme.  The  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4.

 

Feedback
Back to the top of the page