Issue - decisions

PROW: Review of Definitive Map Processes and impact of imminent implementation of the Deregulation Act 2015

19/07/2019 - Public Rights of Way - Review of Definitive Map Processes and Impact of Imminent Implementation of the Deregulation Act 2015

Resolved:  (i)      That the findings of the Review of the Statement of Priorities be supported and that the revised Statement at Annex 6 be adopted, including the requirement to ensure that any direction from the Secretary of State at Defra (SOS) will be dealt with within either 3 months or 12 months, according to the type of direction received.

 

                   (ii)      That an amendment to the current scheme of delegation be authorised so that definitive map modification order applications to make changes to the definitive map and statement will be determined by an Assistant Director or more senior officer with responsibility for the Rights of Way team, in consultation with the Executive Member for Transportand affected ward councillors.

 

                   (iii)     That a report considering the progress of reducing the backlog of definitive map modification order applications be presented to the Executive Member for Transportevery 6 months, with a copy to be sent to the Local Government Ombudsman.

 

                   (iv)    That an apprentice / trainee role for rights of way be developed, to focus initially on definitive map modification order applications, with the cost of  this - £25,000, to be incorporated as unavoidable growth in the 2020/21 budget process for consideration by Full Council when setting the budget for 2020/21.

 

                   (v)     That further resources be kept under review to ensure that the council delivers on its new commitment to deal with SOS directions within either 3 months or 12 months according to the type of direction received.

 

Reasons:   a)      With the aim of eliminating the definitive map modification order backlog in the shortest possible time with the resources available.

                  

                   b)      To reduce the risk of further appeals for non-determination and further complaints to the Local Government Ombudsman.

                  

                   c)      To comply with the findings of the Local Government Ombudsman and prevent a finding of maladministration against the council.

 

                   d)      To ensure that the statutory escalation process to the Secretary of State results in resolution.

 


 

Feedback
Back to the top of the page