Issue - decisions

2016/17 Speed Management Programme – Relocation of Speed Limits - Experimental Traffic Regulation Orders

21/12/2018 - 2016/17 Speed Management Programme - Relocation of speed limits - Experimental TRO's - results

Resolved:

 

(i)      That the results of the experiment along with the objections and comments received be noted.

 

(ii)      That approval be given to make the traffic regulation order to relocate the start of the 30mph speed limit at Hopgrove Lane South, Hopgrove permanent.

 

Reason: To maintain the reduced speeds and improved compliance with the 30mph speed limit within the built-up areas.  

 

(iii)     That the decision be taken not to make the traffic regulation order to relocate the start of the 30mph speed limit at Tadcaster Road, Copmanthorpe permanent and for it to be moved back to its original location.

 

          Reason: Due to the concerns raised by Cllr Carr under public participation about the amount of opposition from Ward and Parish Councillors and residents in relation to the position of the experimental TRO.

 

(iv)    That  officers investigate the possibility of the addition of 30 roundel road markingsat the signs’ original location.

 

Reason: To further reinforce the start of the 30mph speed limits.

 

(v)     That the location of the start of the 30mph limit at Common Road Dunnington be reconsidered, in consultation with local representatives, to determine whether to retain the current experimental location or to revert to the previous location. The experimental location can be retained until August 2019.

 

Reason: To reconsider the most effective location for speed management near the sports club and within the village.

 

(vi)    That changing the existing 30mph speed limit start point on Murton Way, Murton, be re-considered in the 2019/20 speed management programme.

 

Reason: To determine whether a speeding problem still exists and to then reduce speeds within the village of Murton by moving the start of the 30mph limit in line with the findings of this experiment.

 


 

Feedback
Back to the top of the page