Agenda item

Motions on Notice (7:35 pm)

Meeting of Council, Wednesday, 17 July 2024 6.30 pm (Item 20.)

To consider the following Motions on Notice under Standing Order B13:

Motions submitted for consideration directly by Council, in accordance with Standing Order 22.1

(i) From Cllr B Burton

York Public Spending

“Council notes:

· Real terms funding reductions to City of York Council over a sustained period;

· The very difficult decisions the council has taken since 2011 to balance the budget - decisions involving all of York’s main political parties;

· The particular challenges for York of having the lowest funding across all public services of any single tier council area in the country, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, and the compound effect this has for each individual public service;

· Acute problems around access to affordable dentistry, A&E and mental health care, and Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) provision in schools;

· The prospect of increasingly difficult budget decisions impacting valued council services over the next three years if national funding remains as forecast in the council’s Medium-Term Financial Strategy;

· York’s membership of the F20 Group of lowest funded local authorities in the country and the need for that Group to be active at this point in making its case to the new Government.

Council believes:

· While political groups often have different priorities, councillors share a commitment to the city’s services receiving fair funding.

· Further, it believes specific pressure areas for local government require long term solutions and should be a priority for the new Government:

Council resolves:

· To request the Chief Finance Officer and Executive Leader jointly write to the Chancellor of the Exchequer and Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities to request urgency in concluding the Fair Funding Review, first signalled by the Government in 2016, detailing why this is necessary;

· To request this opportunity is used to also highlight service pressures and to request long-term funding certainty to enable the council to plan its services over the period of each four-year electoral cycle;

· To request the Director of Public Health and Executive Member for Health, Wellbeing and Adult Social Care write to the Secretary of State for Health, pushing for early reform of the NHS dental contract to open up greater access to NHS dentistry in the city as soon as possible;

· To request Executive works collaboratively with other parts of the public sector locally, including York and North Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority, to consider how each can make efficiencies and save money by reviewing how services are delivered;

· To put on record its thanks to staff and partners for their work over several years in such challenging circumstances, and for their continued commitment to service delivery to the city.”

(ii) From Cllr Knight

Giving York’s children the best start in life

“Council notes:

· The two-child limit, introduced by the Conservative Government in 2017, restricts support in Universal Credit and tax credits to two children in a family.

· Analysis by the Child Poverty Action Group shows that 900,000 children living in poverty in England do not currently qualify for free school meals because the Conservative Government introduced an arbitrary £7,400 household income threshold in 2018.

· A new report by the Commons Education Select Committee warns mental health problems and cost-of-living pressures on families are among the complex reasons for increased absenteeism.

· There are 2,737 children living in absolute poverty, representing 8.9% of all children in York.

· There are 3,372 children living in relative poverty, representing 11% of all children in York.

Council believes:

· Scrapping the two-child limit is the most cost-effective way to reduce child poverty. It would lift 250,000 children out of poverty and mean 850,000 children are in less deep poverty across the UK and will lift at least 325 children in York out of absolute poverty.

Council resolves to:

· Ask the Council Leader to write to Members of Parliament representing York Central and York Outer, expressing the Council’s support for the scrapping of the two-child benefit cap.

· Ask the Council Leader to write to the new Secretary of State for Work and Pensions to encourage them to scrap the two-child benefit cap.”

(iii) From Cllr Baxter

Ending disenfranchisement in elections

“Council notes:

· The significant increase in voters registering to vote by post since 1997, when fewer than 1 million were registered, to the 2024 Parliamentary Election where an estimated 10 million (approx. 1 in 5) were registered to vote by post;

· The importance of ensuring the postal voting system is robust as it accounts for a growing proportion of votes cast with every election;

· National law prevents Returning Officers from issuing emergency proxy votes to electors whose postal votes have not arrived on time, leaving the potential for them being unable to vote;

· Issues in the 2024 Parliamentary Election with the timely delivery of postal vote applications and ballot papers through the postal system, and the impact this has had on electors with many left unable to vote;

· The recommended solution for the late arrival of postal vote ballot papers being to take them to a polling station instead of posting them fails to acknowledge mobility as one of the main challenges to voting in person and why people register for postal votes in the first place;

· Some electors also being left unable to vote following the requirement to present Voter ID, evidenced by Electoral Commission data returns from polling stations nationally in 2023;

· The requirement for Voter ID disproportionately affecting those from low-income households and other marginalised groups.

Council believes:

· The Government should listen to the legitimate concerns of professional members of the Association of Electoral Administrators (AEA) who state the legal timetable around postal votes means the current system gets overloaded and cannot cope.

· Disenfranchising voters in a democracy is inexcusable and must be urgently reviewed to ensure it doesn’t happen again in future.

Council puts on record its thanks to council and other staff working so hard over local, regional and national elections to support the democratic process.

Council resolves to:

· Ask Group Leaders to write to the Secretary of State with responsibility for Local Government and to the Minister with responsibility for elections to support the calls of the AEA in requesting a review of current postal and emergency proxy vote rules, including revising the timetable for postal vote registrations, to ensure everyone who registers can vote;

· Request the Government conducts a review of the requirement to present ID to vote that considers:

a) the types of ID accepted; and

b) if it is shown to disenfranchise registered voters that the requirement to present ID to vote is scrapped altogether.”

(iv) From Cllr Ayre

Fair Funding for York

“Council notes:

· The Institute for Fiscal Studies released a report into the disparity of funding for the same public services in different Council areas

· The IFS finding that the national average of funding per person is £4310 compared to only £3642 for York, ranking York last in England and significantly behind North Yorkshire (£4005 per person) and East Riding (£4059 per person) when all services were considered

· Of the 150 Council areas in England, York ranked 150^th overall, 147^th in NHS funding, 148^th in schools funding, 143^rd in Local Government funding, 49^th in Police funding and 127^th in public health funding. This represents a £668 per person shortfall in spending on the national average or a £135 million gap for the city as a whole

· The work the previous Liberal Democrat led administration did to highlight this issue and help form a cross-party group of councils from across the county to lobby for a fair funding solution for the least well-funded councils in England

· The casework issues ward councillors have experienced in York with residents who can’t book a GP appointment, can’t register with an NHS dentist, struggle to find school places or have been affected by crime and anti-social behaviour

· The specific challenges York faces relating to increasing numbers of older residents and the need to provide for additional Adult Social Care services

Council believes:

· Successive governments have failed to address the long-standing lack of funding across all public services in York

· The new government should invest an extra £300 million into the local authorities that struggle to provide essential and valued services to their local communities due to low core spending power

· The F20 group is right that there should be a funding floor of 90% of average core spending power of local authorities, if this was enacted York would gain £78 extra per capita

· Fair funding for York would mean the council would be better able to provide the services that are desperately needed to fix the crisis in funding of Adult Social Care we see in York

Council resolves to:

· Request the Council Leader and Leader of the Liberal Democrat group write to the new Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities to urge the government to take action to resolve York’s chronic underfunding by central government by closing the funding gap between York and the national average within this parliament.

· Request the Council Leader to write to York’s Labour MPs to request that they urgently lobby the government to introduce a fair funding solution to close the gap between the most and least funded Council areas in England

· Request the Council to engage with the F20 group of the lowest funded Council areas in England to build an England wide campaign for fair funding and enact their principles in the next funding settlement

· Call on the new government to commit to a funding floor of 90% in the next financial settlement.”

Minutes:

(i) York Public Spending

Moved by Cllr B Burton, seconded by Cllr Coles.

“Council notes:

· Real terms funding reductions to City of York Council over a sustained period;

· The very difficult decisions the council has taken since 2011 to balance the budget - decisions involving all of York’s main political parties;

· Acute problems around access to affordable dentistry, A&E and mental health care, and Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) provision in schools;

· York’s membership of the F20 Group of lowest funded local authorities in the country and the need for that Group to be active at this point in making its case to the new Government.

Council believes:

· While political groups often have different priorities, councillors share a commitment to the city’s services receiving fair funding.

· Further, it believes specific pressure areas for local government require long term solutions and should be a priority for the new Government:

Council resolves:

· To put on record its thanks to staff and partners for their work over several years in such challenging circumstances, and for their continued commitment to service delivery to the city.”

On being put to the vote, the motion was declared CARRIED unanimously, and it was

Resolved: That the above motion be approved.

(ii) Giving York’s children the best start in life

Moved by Cllr Knight, seconded by Cllr Waller.

“Council notes:

· The two-child limit, introduced by the Conservative Government in 2017, restricts support in Universal Credit and tax credits to two children in a family.

· A new report by the Commons Education Select Committee warns mental health problems and cost-of-living pressures on families are among the complex reasons for increased absenteeism.

· There are 2,737 children living in absolute poverty, representing 8.9% of all children in York.

· There are 3,372 children living in relative poverty, representing 11% of all children in York.

Council believes:

Council resolves to:

· Ask the Council Leader to write to Members of Parliament representing York Central and York Outer, expressing the Council’s support for the scrapping of the two-child benefit cap.

· Ask the Council Leader to write to the new Secretary of State for Work and Pensions to encourage them to scrap the two-child benefit cap.”

On being put to the vote, the motion was declared CARRIED, and it was

Resolved: That the above motion be approved.

(iii) Ending disenfranchisement in elections

Moved by Cllr Baxter, seconded by Cllr Rose.

“Council notes:

· The importance of ensuring the postal voting system is robust as it accounts for a growing proportion of votes cast with every election;

· National law prevents Returning Officers from issuing emergency proxy votes to electors whose postal votes have not arrived on time, leaving the potential for them being unable to vote;

· Some electors also being left unable to vote following the requirement to present Voter ID, evidenced by Electoral Commission data returns from polling stations nationally in 2023;

· The requirement for Voter ID disproportionately affecting those from low-income households and other marginalised groups.

Council believes:

· Disenfranchising voters in a democracy is inexcusable and must be urgently reviewed to ensure it doesn’t happen again in future.

Council puts on record its thanks to council and other staff working so hard over local, regional and national elections to support the democratic process.

Council resolves to:

· Request the Government conducts a review of the requirement to present ID to vote that considers:

a) the types of ID accepted; and

b) if it is shown to disenfranchise registered voters that the requirement to present ID to vote is scrapped altogether.”

Cllr Hollyer then moved, and Cllr Fenton seconded, an amendment to the above motion, as follows:

“In the first paragraph, under ‘Council notes’, add the following additional bullet points:

· ‘More in Common’s recent poll that revealed that the new Voter ID rules may have stopped 400,000 people from voting in the General Election;

· The national voter turnout fell by 7.4% nationally and an average of 10.35% in York’s two constituencies at the July 2024 General Election;

· The “York Opposes Voter ID Requirements” motion that was passed at the 15th December 2022 Full Council meeting that committed the Council to opposing the ID voting requirements.’

In the second paragraph, under ‘Council believes’, addthe following additional bullet point:

· ‘That all the evidence of the last two years of local elections and the General Election shows that the “York Opposes Voter ID Requirements” was right that the new Voter ID laws has “undermined the democratic process and has created barriers to exercising the right to vote, disproportionately affecting ethnic minority, low income, homeless, LGBT+, elderly, disabled and young people.’

In the third paragraph, under ‘Council resolves to’:

- Delete: ‘Request the Government conducts a review of the requirement to present ID to vote that considers: a) the types of ID accepted; and b) if it is shown to disenfranchise registered voters that the requirement to present ID to vote is scrapped altogether’, and substitute:

· ‘Request the Government scraps the Voter ID requirement for voting completely.’”

On being put to the vote, the amendment was declared CARRIED.

The motion, as amended, now read as follows:

“Council notes:

· The importance of ensuring the postal voting system is robust as it accounts for a growing proportion of votes cast with every election;

· National law prevents Returning Officers from issuing emergency proxy votes to electors whose postal votes have not arrived on time, leaving the potential for them being unable to vote;

· Some electors also being left unable to vote following the requirement to present Voter ID, evidenced by Electoral Commission data returns from polling stations nationally in 2023;

· The requirement for Voter ID disproportionately affecting those from low-income households and other marginalised groups.

· More in Common’s recent poll that revealed that the new Voter ID rules may have stopped 400,000 people from voting in the General Election;

· The national voter turnout fell by 7.4% nationally and an average of 10.35% in York’s two constituencies at the July 2024 General Election;

· The “York Opposes Voter ID Requirements” motion that was passed at the 15th December 2022 Full Council meeting that committed the Council to opposing the ID voting requirements.

Council believes:

· Disenfranchising voters in a democracy is inexcusable and must be urgently reviewed to ensure it doesn’t happen again in future.

· That all the evidence of the last two years of local elections and the General Election shows that the “York Opposes Voter ID Requirements” was right that the new Voter ID laws has “undermined the democratic process and has created barriers to exercising the right to vote, disproportionately affecting ethnic minority, low income, homeless, LGBT+, elderly, disabled and young people.

Council puts on record its thanks to council and other staff working so hard over local, regional and national elections to support the democratic process.

Council resolves to:

· Request the Government scraps the Voter ID requirement for voting completely.”

On being put to the vote, the amended motion was declared CARRIED, and it was

Resolved: That the above motion, as amended, be approved.

(iv) Fair Funding for York

Moved by Cllr Ayre moved, seconded by Cllr Cuthbertson.

“Council notes:

· The Institute for Fiscal Studies released a report into the disparity of funding for the same public services in different Council areas

· Of the 150 Council areas in England, York ranked 150^th overall, 147th in NHS funding, 148th in schools funding, 143rd in Local Government funding, 49th in Police funding and 127th in public health funding. This represents a £668 per person shortfall in spending on the national average or a £135 million gap for the city as a whole

· The specific challenges York faces relating to increasing numbers of older residents and the need to provide for additional Adult Social Care services

Council believes:

· Successive governments have failed to address the long-standing lack of funding across all public services in York

· The new government should invest an extra £300 million into the local authorities that struggle to provide essential and valued services to their local communities due to low core spending power

· The F20 group is right that there should be a funding floor of 90% of average core spending power of local authorities, if this was enacted York would gain £78 extra per capita

· Fair funding for York would mean the council would be better able to provide the services that are desperately needed to fix the crisis in funding of Adult Social Care we see in York

Council resolves to:

· Call on the new government to commit to a funding floor of 90% in the next financial settlement.”

On being put to the vote, the motion was declared CARRIED unanimously, and it was

Resolved: That the above motion be approved.

Action Required
1. To note approval of the motion on York public spending and take the appropriate action.	DM
2. To note approval of the motion on giving York’s children the best start in life and take the appropriate action.	PS
3. To note approval of the motion on ending disenfranchisement in elections (as amended) and take the appropriate action.	BR
4. To note approval of the motion on fair funding for York and take the appropriate action.	DM