Agenda item

This is a listed building consent application for the installation of replacement white timber double glazed windows at numbers 1 to 16 (inclusive) Hawthorn Terrace, New Earswick. [Site Visit]

Members considered an application for listed building consent for  the installation of replacement white timber double glazed windows at properties(numbers 1-16 inclusive) situated on Hawthorn Terrace South.

Officers circulated a copy of to Members of a New Earswick Conservation Note. (This is attached to the agenda for the meeting under the item.) They explained that they had recommendation refusal because that it was felt that the proposed design of the windows was unsuitable for listed buildings.

Representations were heard from the applicant, the Joseph Rowntree Housing Trust (JRHT), who explained that the scheme to replace the current windows were part of the village’s continuous development in line with the social vision of the Trust. He added that the current windows were not original, and had been inserted in the 1970s.

Further representations were heard from another representative of the JRHT who stated that the new design of the windows were proposed because;

• The existing windows were in poor condition
• That all the other properties owned by the Trust have already had work done to improve their energy performance, and that therefore it was necessary to complete this on Hawthorn Terrace South and Ivy Place.
• The new designs respected that double glazing was not preferred by residents, and included wooden frames.
• The ironmongery on the windows was modern and secure.
• It would offer a coherent style to the village, which would contribute to its overall design and not detract from it.

Members asked about the difference between the original design of the windows and the 1970s windows.

The representatives of the JRHT replied that the difference between the originals and those built in the 1970s was that the configuration of opening the sashes were maintained.

Members asked a question to the applicants about the insulation provided by the proposed windows compared with those recommended by the Conservation Officer.

The applicants replied that the heritage glazing recommended by the Conservation Officer was thinner than the proposed glazing, and that this glazing would reduce fuel costs for residents by approximately £150 annually.

Representations in favour of the application were heard from a local resident who lived in Hawthorn Terrace South.

He mentioned how although the existing windows, had a draught strip fixed to them, that they did not keep out the cold or condensation. This meant that the wooden frames were starting to deteriorate. He stated that his heating bills were rising in cost as the windows were single glazed. Further to this he informed the Committee how this had detrimentally affected his and his wife’s quality of life. In response to a suggestion in the Officer’s report for optional secondary glazing, he felt that this would not keep out the heat and would be difficult to operate for residents.    

Further discussion ensued between Members, points raised included;

• It was felt that the proposed design of the windows  made them highly noticeable.
• That the thickness of the frames was due to the nature of the hinges.
• The frames were also thick due to all new windows needing a five point locking area.
• That there was a public benefit to the windows and that they did not offer any substantial harm to the character of the buildings.

RESOLVED:             That the application be deferred.

REASON:                  In order to allow for further discussion to take place  between the applicant and Officers