Agenda and minutes
Venue: Guildhall
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Appointment of Chair Minutes: RESOLVED:That Councillor Firth be appointed as Chair of the Customer Complaints Scrutiny Review Task Group. |
|
|
Declarations of Interest At this point Members are asked to declare any personal or prejudicial interests they may have in the business on this agenda. Minutes: Members were invited to declare any personal or prejudicial interests they might have in the business on the agenda. None were declared. |
|
|
Public Participation At this point in the meeting, members of the public who have registered their wish to speak regarding an item on the agenda or an issue within the Committee’s remit can do so. The deadline for registering is by 5pm on
To register please contact the Democracy Officer for the meeting, on the details at the foot of this agenda. Minutes: It was reported that there had been no registrations to speak under the council’s Public Participation Scheme. |
|
|
Customer Complaints Review - Scoping Report. This report asks Members to agree a workplan and provides information gathered to date in support of the Customer Complaints Scrutiny review. Additional documents:
Minutes: Members considered a report which provided information gathered to date in support of the Customer Complaints scrutiny review.
Consideration was given to the remit and timeframe for the review, as detailed in paragraph 6 of the report.
Members discussed the following issues:
(i) Complaints to the Ombudsman
Members requested that information on complaints to the Ombudsman be presented at the next meeting. It was hoped that this would identify whether there were a number of complaints that the council may have been able to be resolve at an earlier stage.
(ii) Complaints Project Plan
Consideration was given to progress in implementing the Complaints Project Plan, as detailed in Annex C of the report. Members queried why some of the timescales within the plan had not been met. Officers gave details of the prioritisation that was taking place in respect of IT development work, including the officer time that was currently allocated to the CANs developments.
Details were given of the way in which Members would be able to use the system to record complaints and to monitor their progress. Members expressed their support for a central recording system but stated that, in addition to this, they would wish to retain direct access to the relevant officers.
At the request of Members, details were given of the procedures that would be in place to ensure that deadlines in respect of the handling of complaints were met, including the use of electronic flag alerts.
Officers confirmed that there would be the time and opportunity for recommendations from the task group to be taken into account when the developments were made and before the system went live. It would also be helpful to involve Members at the testing stage.
(iii) Possible Revisions to Policy and Procedures
Consideration was given to the Corporate Customer Feedback Policy and Procedures dated April 2009. It was noted that officers had already identified some possible changes on which it would be helpful to consult with the task group.
Members raised the following issues in respect of the policy: · There needed to be greater clarity in defining service requests and complaints. Whilst it was recognised that there were benefits in recording service requests for analysis by service areas, it was important that these were not included in the data on the number of complaints. · Concerns were expressed regarding the requirement to “escalate” a complaint to Stage 1 and the lack of clarity as to how this was implemented. It was suggested that the complaints procedure should commence at Stage 1. · The wording at Stage 1 of the procedure should be amended to read “should be advised of the outcome within 10 working days or advised of any delay and when they can expect the outcome…” · It was not appropriate for a complainant to have to set out their complaint again at Stage 2. It may be antagonistic to expect the complainant to provide information that they had already supplied at Stage 1 of the procedure. · At Stage 3 ... view the full minutes text for item 4. |
PDF 163 KB