Agenda, decisions and minutes

Contact: Judith Cumming  Democracy Officer

Items
No. Item

19.

Declarations of Interest

At this point, Members are asked to declare any personal or prejudicial interest they may have in the business on this agenda.

Minutes:

The Executive Member was invited to declare at this point in the meeting any personal or prejudical interests he might have in the business on the agenda. He confirmed he had none.

20.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 77 KB

To approve and sign the minutes of the Decision Session of the Executive Member for Learning, Culture and Social Inclusion held on 27 January 2010

Minutes:

RESOLVED:  That the minutes of the meeting of the Decision Session – Executive Member for Leisure Culture & Social Inclusion held on 27 January 2010 be approved and signed by the Executive Member as a correct record.

21.

Public Participation

 

 

 

At this point in the meeting, members of the public who have registered their wish to speak at the meeting can do so. The deadline for registering is 5:00pm on   Monday 8 March 2010.               

 

Members of the public may register to speak on:-

·        an item on the agenda;

·        an issue within the Executive Member’s remit;

·        an item that has been published on the Information Log since the last session.  Information reports are listed at the end of the agenda. 

 

 

 

 

Minutes:

It had been reported that there had been one registration to speak at the meeting under the Council’s Public Participation Scheme.

 

Cllr Crisp spoke on item 4 Inclusive Arts.  She commented on the rebranding of the Community Arts Service and expressed her concerns.  She commended officers on the work they had done on the report and the new remit but requested an explanation on the following:

  • Why officers felt it was necessary to rebrand, as this was not always a positive step.
  • What were the long term intensions to the service?
  • Why officers felt it was necessary to change something that was a success.
  • Project funding.

 

She felt the rebrand was an unnecessary expense and could have a negative impact to the core functions.

22.

Inclusive Arts pdf icon PDF 83 KB

This report summarises the work to date of the Community Arts Team within Learning Culture and Children’s Services and asks the Executive Member to agree a revised remit for a new “Inclusive Arts Service”.

Additional documents:

Decision:

RESOLVED:       That the Executive Member agrees:

 

(i) The objectives set out in paragraph 9.

 

(ii) The approach to organisational structure set out in paragraph 10 with the following amendments:

 

· Bullet point 1 - Create a more distinct entity for the service with the Council as the main stakeholder but with the involvement of community stakeholders, such as the Social Inclusion Working Group, in advice and  governance of the projects.

 

· Bullet point 4 - Create a reporting line to the Executive Member for Leisure Culture & Social Inclusion Decision Session.

 

 

Reason:  To create a remit for a new “Inclusive Arts Service”

Minutes:

The Executive Member considered a report which asked him to agree a revised remit for a new “Inclusive Arts Service”.

 

Officers informed the Executive Member that the report was to restate and refine the nature of the service and put it in a stronger position in the future. Officers confirmed that the rebranding had no hidden agenda but was designed to increase the profile of the service and public understanding of its activities and objectives.  Officers discussed the objectives set out in the report and verified that the service would have a broader remit to ensure that as many residents as possible would share in the city’s cultural, economic, environmental and social well being, including those living in a deprived neighbourhood.  Cllr Crisp commented on her dislike of the term “deprived neighbourhood” as she felt that there maybe deprived families living in neighbourhoods that were not deprived who may, in consequence, be overlooked.  She asked officers to consider this issue and suggested they have more involvement with the Ward Committees.

 

Officers commented on the organisational structure and how they would be ensuring a long-term financial sustainability and productivity.  They would be working to create a more distinct entity for the service with the Council as the main stakeholder but with the involvement of community stakeholders such as the Social Inclusion Working Group (SIWG). Officers explained the different types of funding options available and how they would be working towards securing and increasing the project funding that supports the community aspirations and the project funding that contributes to the core running costs of the team. It was suggested that extra funding might be sourced if the team could offer a consultancy service to businesses outside of the York area.  Officers confirmed that this was a possibility but it would have to be explored on a case by case basis.

 

The Executive Member confirmed that during this current economic climate, he was pleased that the Council could maintain the community arts service in York and that the review would prove a clearer remit for the community arts team. He stated that the focus of the work should be about outcomes rather than outputs and he noted the considerable recognition the team had received, including two national big draw awards and a Scottish Mental Health Film award, which proves that the arts community team provide a high quality of service. The Executive Member commended staff for bringing in over half a million pounds of investment into the city from external sources. He stated that it was key to the project that this work continues and that the external funding also contributes to the core running cost of the service.

 

RESOLVED:       That the Executive Member agrees:

 

(i) The objectives set out in paragraph 9

 

(ii) The approach to organisational structure set out in paragraph 10 with the following amendments:

 

· Bullet point 1 - Create a more distinct entity for the service with the Council as the main stakeholder but with the involvement of community  ...  view the full minutes text for item 22.

 

Feedback
Back to the top of the page