Agenda and minutes

At this point, members are asked to declare any personal or prejudicial interests they may have in the business on this agenda.

Members were invited to declare at this point in the meeting, any personal or prejudicial interests they might have in the business on the agenda. None were declared.

At this point in the meeting members of the public who have registered their wish to speak regarding an item on the agenda or an issue within the Committee’s remit can do so.  The deadline for registering is Monday 6 October 2008at 5.00 pm.

The Chair reported that no registrations to speak had been received under the Council’s public participation scheme.

This report outlines the suggested scope and timetable for the Planning Enforcement review which aims to identify ways of bringing enforcement cases to an earlier completion through reviewing City of York Council’s approach to planning enforcement and court action.

Consideration was given to the suggested scoping report and timetable for the Planning Enforcement Scrutiny Review. The review aims to identify ways of bringing enforcement cases to an earlier completion through reviewing City of York Council’s approach to planning enforcement  and court action.

Officers updated that a change was required to the timetable on page 5 of the report. Reference to a meeting on 7 November should read 7^th October. Also that recommendation (d) on page 7 of the report should refer to paragraph 13 rather than paragraph 12.

Documents detailing Planning  Enforcement figures for the East Area since June 2003, the possible routes to be taken by Enforcement Officers and the Executive Summary for a review into the Powers of Enforcement – Take Aways were distributed and are attached to these minutes at Annexes A, B and C.

The Authority’s Head of Development Control gave Members a presentation entitled Planning Enforcement At York, attached at Annex D of these minutes. This gave Members an overview of Planning Enforcement at a local and national level, in particular the regulations that apply and the processes involved in tackling breaches of planning control.

Following on from the presentation, Members discussed the issues surrounding planning enforcement, in particular the timescale involved when bringing an enforcement case to a conclusion. Officers suggested that as part of the review it would be beneficial for Members to look at the current timetables for each stage of the enforcement process to establish where improvements can be made. Members went on to highlighted a number of other issues that were of concern to them such as  :

Ø      The role developers play in causing delays if any.

Ø      The possibility of timings being introduced for the different stages of the enforcement process.

Ø      How likely the authority is to bring court action against an individual.

Ø      Whether delays are standard across all authorities

Ø      If minor breaches could be tackled differently.

Members briefly discussed what they would like to see the review focused on but it was decided that queries such as the above, would be looked at in greater detail at future meetings.

Councillor Douglas expressed an interest in spending a day with an enforcement officer to obtain an overview of a typical day in the department and to see what the role involves.

In reference to the timetable for the review, Members suggested an additional meeting in December to enable the review to progress and it was decided that a training course on Planning Enforcement be held after the review.

RESOLVED: (i)That subject to the following changes to the timetable for the review, approval be given to the proposed timetable and scoping: