Agenda and minutes

Venue: The Guildhall

Contact: Laura Bootland 

Items
No. Item

1.

Chair pdf icon PDF 146 KB

To elect a Member to act as Chair of the meeting.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

RESOLVED:       That Councillor Boyce be elected as Chair of the meeting.

 

2.

Introductions

Minutes:

Introductions were carried out by the Chair.

3.

Declarations of Interest

At this point Members are asked to declare any personal or prejudicial interests they may have in the business on this agenda.

Minutes:

At this point in the meeting, Members were asked to declare any personal or prejudicial interests they might have in the business on the agenda.  None were declared.

4.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 86 KB

To approve and sign the minutes of the Licensing Hearing held on 19 January 2012.

Minutes:

RESOLVED:       That the minutes of the Licensing Hearing held on 19 January 2012 be approved as a correct record and signed by the Chair.

 

5.

The Determination of an Application by Mr. S Altin for a Premises Licence Section 18 (3) (a) in respect of 67 Walmgate, York, YO1 9TZ. (CYC- 020378) pdf icon PDF 137 KB

Minutes:

Members considered an application by Mr S Altin for a Premises Licence in respect of 67 Walmgate, York.

 

In coming to their decision the sub-committee took into consideration all of the evidence and submissions that were presented to them and determined their relevance to the issues raised and the licensing objectives.  The following were taken into account:

 

1.      The application form.

 

2.      The Licensing Manager’s report and her comments made at the Hearing. She advised that the application was for a premises licence at 67 Walmgate. The premise is not located within the special policy area.  A plan showing the layout was tabled.  A number of conditions had been agreed with North Yorkshire Police and consultation had been carried out successfully.

 

3.      The representations made at the hearing on behalf of Mr Altin. Members were advised that the premises supervisor was an experienced licence holder and that the applicant was distancing himself from the original intended supervisor.  It was stated that the Police were satisfied with the conditions that had been agreed and that the premises would have CCTV in place.

 

4.           The representations made at the hearing by local residents who raised concerns about the potential for an increase in nuisance and anti social behaviour and they drew attention to problems that already existed in the area. 

 

5.           Written representations made by local residents during the consultation period.

 

In respect of the proposed licence, the Sub-Committee had to determine whether to take any of the steps mentioned under Section 35(4) that it considered necessary for the promotion of the licensing objectives.Having regard to the above evidence and representations received, the Sub-Committee considered the steps which were available to them to take under Section 35(4) of the Licensing Act 2003 as it considered necessary for the promotion of the Licensing Objectives:

 

Option 1:  Grant the licence in the terms applied for and including any applicable mandatory conditions of the Licensing Act 2003 as amended. This option was rejected as the Sub-Committee considered that it was necessary to add or modify any conditions to meet the Licensing Objectives.

 

Option 2: Grant the licence with modified/additional conditions imposed by the licensing committee including any applicable mandatory conditions of the Licensing Act 2003 as amended. This option was approved as the Sub-Committee considered there to be reason to modify or add any conditions to meet the Licensing Objectives.

 

Option 3: Grant the licence to which the application relates and modify/add conditions accordingly to include any applicable mandatory conditions of the Licensing Act 2003 as amended. This option was rejected as the Sub-Committee considered there was no reason to exclude any of the licensable activities, based on the representations, the Licensing Objectives and City of York Council Licensing Policy.

 

Option 4:  Reject the application. This option was rejected, as the Sub-Committee saw no reason to reject the application based on the Licensing Objectives and City of York Council Licensing Policy.

In coming to their decision of approving the above  ...  view the full minutes text for item 5.

 

Feedback
Back to the top of the page