Agenda and minutes

Venue: The Thornton Room - Ground Floor, West Offices (G039). View directions

Contact: Angela Bielby  Democracy Officer

Items
No. Item

1.

Chair pdf icon PDF 170 KB

To elect a Member to act as Chair of the meeting.

Minutes:

Resolved:  That Councillor Reid be appointed to Chair the meeting.

2.

Introductions

3.

Declarations of Interest

At this point in the meeting, Members are asked to declare:

 

·        any personal interests not included on the Register of Interests

·        any prejudicial interests or

·        any disclosable pecuniary interests

 

which they may have in respect of business on this agenda.

 

Minutes:

Members were asked to declare any personal interests not included on the Register of Interests, any prejudicial interests or any disclosable pecuniary interests which they may have in respect of business on the agenda. None were declared.

 

4.

The Determination of an Application by Mr Paul James Rhodes for a Premises Licence [Section 18(3)(a)] in respect of Holtby Grange, Holtby Lane, York, YO19 5XQ (CYC-060806) pdf icon PDF 158 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Members considered an application by Mr Paul James Rhodes for a Premises Licence [Section 18(3)(a)] in respect of Holtby Grange, Holtby Lane, York,

 

In considering your application and the representations made, the Sub-Committee concluded that the following licensing objectives were relevant to this Hearing:

 

1.           The prevention of public nuisance

2.           Public safety

 

In coming to their decision, the Sub-Committee took into consideration all the evidence and submissions that were presented, and determined their relevance to the issues raised and the above licensing objectives, including:

 

1.      The application form.

 

2.      The Licensing Manager’s report and her comments made at the Hearing. She outlined the proposed activities and their timings made in the application, and noted the information contained within the annexes to the report (including the operating schedule), adding that annex 3 had been circulated as there was one page missing from the printed pack. She advised that the premises were not located in the special policy Cumulative Impact Zone (CIZ). She reported that the consultation had been carried out correctly in accordance with the Licensing Act 2003. She stated that conditions had been mediated with North Yorkshire Police and City of York Council Public Protection (Environmental Protection). She stated that there had been representations from 19 other interested parties. She outlined the four options available to the committee.

 

In response to questions raised, the Licensing Manager confirmed that that the application limited the number of people on site to 5000, however, there was no capacity stated in the application. She was asked and explained why amendments may have been made to the application form, such as temporary structures such as tents being classed as indoor, not outdoor structures. In response to a question regarding the portable bar she reported that the licensed area was for the whole site. Following a question regarding planning issues she explained that planning and licensing were separate processes. In response to the requested condition from North Yorkshire Police regarding the use of fireworks, the Licensing Manager confirmed that this condition had not been put in before.

 

3.           The representations by the applicant, Mr Paul Rhodes, at the Hearing. He explained that the Licensing Officer made amendments to the application form as the marquee/tepees were classed as indoor structures. He advised that concerning the maximum of 5000 people, his aim was to hold high end weddings, corporate seminars and functions, and he envisaged a maximum of two weddings per week with corporate functions to be held during the day. He advised that there was an average of 80-120 attendees at wedding and he did not envisage more than 120 people attending weddings. Mr Rhodes advised that in order to meet customer needs for functions on different days, he had stated 365 days on the application form. He stated that he would be living on site with your family.  In relation to addressing public nuisance relating to the track leading up to the property, Mr Rhodes explained that the track was owned by the property and  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4.

 

Feedback
Back to the top of the page