Agenda and draft minutes
Venue: The George Hudson Board Room - 1st Floor West Offices (F045). View directions
Contact: Democratic Services
Declarations of Interest
At this point in the meeting, Members are asked to declare:
· any personal interests not included on the Register of Interests
· any prejudicial interests or
· any disclosable pecuniary interests
which they might have in respect of business on this agenda.
Members were asked to declare any personal interests not included on the Register of Interests, any prejudicial interests or any disclosable pecuniary interests which they may have in respect of business on the agenda. None were declared.
To approve and sign the minutes of the meeting held on 28 July 2021.
Members enquired as to whether an update was available on the identifying of funds to cover the costs associated with the Action Plan. Officers confirmed that the Section 151 officer was not in attendance but would be able to bring an update to the Committee meeting on the 29 September 2021.
Resolved: That the minutes of the meeting held on 28 July 2021 be approved and then signed by the Chair as a correct record.
At this point in the meeting members of the public who have
registered to speak can do so. Members of the public may speak
on agenda items or on matters within the remit of the committee.
Please note that our registration deadlines have changed to 2
working days before the meeting, in order to facilitate the
management of public participation at our meetings. The deadline
for registering at this meeting is at 5.00pm on Monday 6
To register to speak please visit
www.york.gov.uk/AttendCouncilMeetings to fill in an online
registration form. If you have any questions about the registration
form or the meeting please contact Democratic Services on the
details at the foot of the agenda.
Webcasting of Public Meetings
Please note that, subject to available resources, this meeting will
be webcast including any registered public speakers who have
given their permission.
The meeting can be viewed live and on demand at
www.york.gov.uk/webcasts. During coronavirus, we've made some
changes to how we're running council meetings. See our
coronavirus updates (www.york.gov.uk/COVIDDemocracy) for
more information on meetings and decisions.
It was reported that there had been four registrations to speak at the meeting under the Council’s Public Participation Scheme. However, one of the speakers was unable to join due to technical issues.
Gwen Swinburn noted that she felt there had been a governance failure in relation to the questions of proportionality and the use of substitutes at the Customer and Corporate Services Scrutiny Management Committee (CCSMC) and questioned members conduct at the meeting. Asked that advice and solutions be shared regarding the meeting and asked that proportionality rules be shared. She also requested that all training for Members be held on Open Data and reviewed for Joint Standards Committee and this Committee and asked that chairs training be given to all members. Finally she asked about public involvement in the review of the Constitution and what progress had been made in recruiting an independent person.
Andy Mendus asked about the Councils policies regarding the use of settlement agreements noting that the report seemed to suggest there should be both used in exceptional circumstances, but also would be commonly used. He also enquired as to there use in redundancies noting that they had been missed in the Settlements report. He also asked whether it was correct for the Council to outline a budget for settlement agreements and raised concerns that the proposals would not deal with issues raised in the Public Interest Report.
Councillor Kilbane welcomed guidance on Members not being allowed to take part in a decision on the use of a settlement agreement, in cases where a complaint was made against that Member, following the occurrence with the exit of the previous Chief Executive. He noted the delay to the review of the Constitution and asked that a further postponement be made to allow for a significant consideration and wide public engagement in the forming of the Constitution.
This report presents guidance prepared for consideration by the Audit & Governance Committee relating to the use of settlement agreements including special severance payments.
The Committee considered the report and the proposed ‘Exit Strategies Guidance on the use of Settlement Agreements
including Special Severance Payments’. Officers noted the new proposed Exit Strategy guide in relation to the Action Plan following the Public Interest Report (PIR) and noted that if agreed by the Committee then it would be referred to consider the adoption and implementation of the strategy.
Members enquired about the reference to Chief Officer in the proposed Exit Strategy, noting that further clarification could be given to identify who classified as a Chief Officer in relation to the strategy. Officers confirmed that Chief Officer would include Assistant Directors, Directors, Corporate Directors, and the Chief Operating Officer. It was also noted that in the case of the exit of a statutory officer such as the Monitoring Officer or the Section 151 Officer, reciprocal arrangements had been made with North Yorkshire County Council to ensure the Council would be supported. Members also noted that redundancy wasn’t included in the strategy which was confirmed would be added.
Financial considerations when deciding on tribunals and the possible use of special severance payment were highlighted as requiring evidence of best value for money and Members enquired whether this would include independent legal advice. It was confirmed that the Chief Legal Officer would perform their function to provide legal advice to the Council, but would often seek independent legal advice which would be legal advice owned and presented by the Chief Legal Officer. The Committee discussed whether the Council should have to seek independent legal advice in relation to any exit agreements with Chief Officers. The role of Internal Audit was raised and whether their opinion should always be sort when determining value for money.
The options on when to settle and what criteria for a settlement were raised and officers noted some of the challenges of a criteria due to each case being unique. It was noted that it can be challenging to identify the full costs related to an exit due to potential future costs, however, it was noted that the Section 151 officer would consider a whole range of costs when determining value for money. Members also enquired about whether actions could be taken in cases where the Council accepted mistakes, prior to a tribunal and appeal. Officers confirmed that this would be the case and could be made clearer within the proposed strategy.
The Committee also discussed how the new proposed exit strategy could address issues highlighted in the PIR as part of its rule in the Action Plan. Members enquired about whether the new strategy would ensure any payments could not be described incorrectly for when Members considered any exit payments and whether the new business case would be clear enough to ensure it avoids errors. Officers confirmed changes should create further clarity, for instance in the business case document it was noted further information would be required to ensure better decision making. The Committee requested therefore that the old strategy and business case ... view the full minutes text for item 23.
This report sets out the proposed revisions to the Council’s Constitution for consideration by the members of the Audit & Governance Committee.
The Chair stated that the Committee would not consider the Review of Council’s Constitution at the meeting, he noted the need for Members to have additional time to consider the changes to the Constitution and Members considered how they would wish to review of the Constitution in future meetings.
Officers outlined a request to amend the current Council Constitution, they noted that in March 2020 the Committee amended the Standing Orders relating to substitutes at a number of Committees. It was noted that this amendment to Planning Committee had meant that due to named substitutes not always being available attendance had been affected, this had been made harder due the Covid-19 pandemic. Members considered and agreed to recommend to Full Council to amend the standing orders to allow for more Members to be available to substitute at Planning meetings.
i. That the Committee recommends to Full Council to amend Section 4B of the Constitution to remove Planning from the meetings which can only use named Substitutes;
ii. That the Committee defer the review of the Constitution to the Committees next meeting on 29 September 2021.
Reason: To ensure Planning meetings can maintain sufficient Membership at Committee meetings. To allow for additional time to consider the Council’s Constitution.
Any other business which the Chair considers urgent under the Local Government Act 1972.
The chair outlined that the Mazars Annual Audit Letter would not be ready for the Committee meeting on the 29 September 2021 and therefore asked the Committee to consider an amendment to the Committee work plan for the 20 October 2021 meeting.
Members discussed how to consider the Constitution and whether it could be considered and signed off in sections. Officers noted that the Committee could consider the Constitution in sections but noted that it would need to be signed off in full by Full Council and noted the timescale for meeting the Action Plan. Noting the length of the Constitution to consider members also discussed the prospect of the creating a cross party working group to discuss the Constitution.
i. The Mazars Annual Audit Letter to be deferred from the 29 September 2021 to 20 October 2021 meeting, the chair and vice chair to consider and ensure the Committee work plan is up to date;
ii. A cross party working group to discuss the Constitution be arranged.
Reason: To ensure that the Committee manages its work
plan effectively and to ensure enough time is dedicated to the consideration of the Constitution.