Issue - meetings

The Determination of an Application by ? for (type of application) [Section ?] in respect of (Address). (CYC-?)

Meeting: 25/06/2020 - Licensing/Gambling Hearing (Item 11)

11 The Determination of an Application by Secret Square Limited for a Premises Licence [Section 18(3)(a)] in respect of Secret Square Limited, Unit 4, Stonegate Walk, Hornby Passage, York, YO1 8AT (CYC - 066152) pdf icon PDF 213 KB

Additional documents:

Decision:

Meeting reconvened remotely in private session on 25 June 2020

 

PRESENT: Councillors Norman (Chair), Cuthbertson and Hook

 

RESOLVED: That the Sub-Committee REJECTS the application for a premises licence for Secret Square Limited, Unit 4, Stonegate Walk, Hornby Passage, York YO1 8AT.  

 

The full reasons for the Sub-Committee’s decision will be included in the written Decision Letter.

 

There is a right of appeal for the Applicant to the Magistrates Court against this decision. Any appeal to the Magistrates Court must be made within 21 days of receipt of the Decision Letter and sent to the following address:

 

Chief Executive

York and Selby Magistrates Court

The Law Courts

Clifford Street

York

YO1 9RE

 

Minutes:

Members considered an application by Secret Square Limited for a Premises Licence [Section 18(3)(a)] in respect of Secret Square Limited, Unit 4, Stonegate Walk, Hornby Passage, York, YO1 8AT.

In considering the application and the representations made, the Sub-Committee concluded that the following licensing objectives were relevant to this Hearing:

 

1.           The Prevention of Crime and Disorder

2.           The Prevention of Public Nuisance

3.           Public Safety

 

In coming to their decision, the Sub-Committee took into consideration all the evidence and submissions that were presented, and determined their relevance to the issues raised and the above licensing objectives, including:

 

1.           The application form.

 

2.           The papers before it

 

3.           The Licensing Manager’s report and her comments given at the Hearing. The Licensing Manager outlined the report noting the amendments to the report that had been circulated to all parties prior to the hearing. She explained the representations that had been received and noted that in relation to the change of use of the building, planning permission was needed for this. She advised the Sub Committee of their options in determining the application. The Senior Solicitor then outlined the changes to the published report.

 

Following the Licensing Manager’s report a number of questions were raised to which the following clarifications were given:

·          The supply of alcohol would be until 23:00 hours

·          Last orders for food would be 22:00 hours

·          The licensed hours would one hour extra on Christmas Eve, New Year’s Eve and Bank Holiday Sundays

·          There were 16 apartments in Stonegate Court

 

4.           The representations made by Mrs Ramli (Agent) on behalf of the Applicant in writing and by Mr and Mrs Ramli at the hearing. Mrs Ramli explained that the application was completely different to the application previously determined by the Sub-Committee. Mrs Ramli’s witness Ms Kavanagh (Business Partner to Mr Kizilkaya, Business Owner) explained that it was a new idea with a focus on food bring the Kurdish culture to York using high calibre chefs to help Mr Kizilkaya develop the menu. Ms Ramli advised that the gate to the access to the premises would not be locked and that the applicant has been given responsibility for locking and unlocking the gate under the lease.  She added that the application was for the supply of alcohol only and that the applicant had not applied for licensable activities after 11.00pm. The premises would open as a café/restaurant if the licence was not granted but would prefer to operate under the control of a premises licence.

 

Mrs Ramli stated that the premises had been granted planning permission for A1 and A3 use.   She referred to the pictures at page 33 of the Agenda pack to demonstrate the layout of the premises as a small restaurant. Concerning the Police representation she drew attention to the premises at 13 and 13a High Ousegate (Ate O’Clock restaurant) noting that it was in the red zone of the Cumulative Impact Area (CIA) and that the licensed courtyard backs onto a residential area. She questioned  ...  view the full minutes text for item 11


 

Feedback
Back to the top of the page