Issue - meetings

This report sets out the Council’s proposed capital budget for the period 2007/08 to 2010/11, highlights capital bids from departments that have been through the revised Capital Resource Allocation Model (CRAM) process and provides options to allow the Council to achieve a balanced four year capital programme.

Members considered a report which set out the Council’s proposed capital budget for the period 2007/08 to 2010/11, highlighted capital bids from departments that had been through the revised Capital Resource Allocation Model (CRAM) process and provided options to achieve a balanced four year capital programme.  Details of the current programme, the externally funded CRAM bids for 2007/08, the rolling programme CRAM bids and rolling programme scheme changes were set out in Annexes 1-5 to the report.  The capital receipts forecast was set out in (exempt) Annex 6 and the proposed programme for 2007/08-2010/11 in Annex 7.

The current approved capital programme ran from 2006/07 to 2008/09.  It was proposed that the 2007/08 budget process would set a programme that would run over 4 years, reflecting best practice and bringing it in line with the Council’s political cycle.  The proposals in the report therefore represented a 2 year extension of the current programme.  If approved, they would result in a capital programme for 2007/08 to 2010/11 of £139.123m and an underlying funding shortfall of £1.6m.  Paragraph 5 summarised the main areas of spend in each department, comprising:

• Children’s Services - £26.m, including £12.5m investment in the new York High School;
• City Strategy - £31m, including £10.8m on carriageway resurfacing and bridge maintenance;
• Housing - £27.1m, including £19.3m on Major Replaces Allowance schemes, making improvements to 2,350 Council homes across York;
• Leisure and Culture - £12m, including £5.2m on a new 25 metre public pool on the York High School site, subject to final approval;
• Resources - £34.7m, including £33.9m on the Council’s Administrative Accommodation project, centred around the Hungate site.

Proposals to close the £1.6m funding gap were presented in paragraphs 22 and 23, as follows:

Proposal 1 (para. 22) – reduce the property investment budget by £50k per annum, subject to review in the light of the outcome of the Administrative Accommodation project.  This would reduce the deficit by £150k.

Proposal 2 (para. 23) – use prudential borrowing in 2010/11 to fund the residual gap left after implementing proposal 1.