Issue - meetings

Members considered an application by Mr Grainger and Mr Hawley for the review of a variation to a club premises licence in respect of Haxby Working Men’s Club (WMC).

In coming to their decision the sub-committee took into consideration all of the evidence and submissions that were presented to them and determined their relevance to the issues raised and the licensing objective – Prevention of Public Nuisance.  The following were taken into account:

1. The application form.

2. The Licensing Officer’s report and his comments made at the Hearing. He advised that there had been a licensed premises on the site for many years and the current licence was granted under grandfather rights in 2005. The application was being made to extend the supply of alcohol by one hour on Friday, Saturday and Sunday nights.

3. The applicant’s representations at the hearing including the fact the applicant wanted to be able to serve alcohol longer on weekends. The applicant advised that the club did not have live acts on Sunday evenings and that the only time the club had been open later recently was under Temporary Events Notices. The applicant told the Panel that the club wanted to be a good neighbour and offered to extend the wall beside the outside area to help block some of the noise.

4. The representations made by local residents in writing and at the hearing. The Sub-Committee considered the representations to be relevant to the licensing objectives as concerns were raised regarding the potential for further public nuisance the area, especially after 11pm at night.

5. The representations made by Councillor Paul Firth at the hearing on behalf of a local resident. He advised that the area was residential and the club had boundaries with residential properties. He advised that residents accepted that the club had been there a long time but residents expected to be able to sleep after 11 pm.

Having regard to the evidence and representations received, the Sub Committee considered the steps which were available for them to take under Section 72 (4) of the Licensing Act 2003 as it considered necessary for the promotion of the Licensing Objectives.

Members were presented with the following options:

Option 1:        Grant the variation of the certificate in the terms applied for and including any applicable mandatory conditions as set out in ss73, 74 and 75 of the Licensing Act 2003.

Option 2:        Grant the variation of the certificate with modified/additional conditions imposed by the Licensing Committee including any applicable mandatory conditions as set out ss73, 74 and 75 of the Licensing Act 2003.

Option 3:        Grant the variation of the certificate to exclude any of the qualifying club activities to which the application relates and modify/add conditions accordingly to include any applicable mandatory conditions as set out ss73, 74 and 75 of the Licensing Act 2003.

Option 4:        Reject the application.

Members chose to grant the variation of the certificate with modified/additional conditions imposed by the licensing committee (Option 2). Members imposed the following conditions:

1. CCTV  ...  view the full minutes text for item 37