Issue - meetings
The Determination of an Application by ? for (type of application) [Section ?] in respect of (Address). (CYC-?)
Meeting: 18/01/2010 - Licensing/Gambling Hearing (Item 39)
Minutes:
Members considered an application by Helen Howlett, Senior Environmental Protection Officer, City of York Council for the review of a Premises Licence in respect of Ziggy’s, 53-55 Micklegate, York.
In coming to their decision the sub-committee took into consideration all of the evidence and submissions that were presented to them and determined their relevance to the issues raised and the licensing objective – Prevention of Public Nuisance. The following were taken into account:
1. The application form, in particular the existing licence conditions and the steps taken by the applicant to promote the four licensing objectives.
2. The Licensing Officer’s report and his comments made at the hearing, including the fact that the review relates to noise complaints dating back three years and a subsequent noise abatement order being breached. The premises owner had worked with the Environmental Protection Unit and progress had already been made towards resolving the problem.
3. The applicant’s representations at the hearing, in particular the fact that Environmental Protection Unit has a duty to take action and the review is a result of a noise abatement order being breached. A number of conditions had been suggested and the applicant had been compliant throughout the process and the Environmental Protection Unit were satisfied that the proposed conditions would be sufficient to address the noise problem at the premises.
4. The representations of the holder of the premises licence, including the fact that he accepted that there had been incidents during which the rear fire door had been left open, and consequently noise levels had been audible outside. He advised that he had now put safeguards in place to ensure the door stayed closed. He advised that he had also taken steps to sound proof the premises further by installing appropriate sound systems. He advised that he was happy to accept the proposed conditions to his licence.
5. The representations made by a representor in writing and at the hearing. The sub-committee considered this representation to be relevant to the issues raised and the licensing objectives listed above, as the representor lived in close proximity to the premises and raised concerns regarding noise coming from the establishment.
6. The representations made by North Yorkshire Police in writing.
Having regard to the application and any relevant representations, the sub-committee had to determine whether to take any of the steps mentioned under Section 52(4) that it considered necessary for the promotion of the Licensing Objective the Prevention of Public Nuisance.
Members were presented with the following options:
Option 1. Modify conditions of licence (ie alter, omit or add any condition including a requirement to display a notice explaining the outcome of the review).
Option 2. Exclude a licensable activity from the scope of the licence.
Option 3. Remove the designated premises supervisor.
Option 4. Suspend the licence for a period not exceeding three months.
Option 5. Revoke the licence.
Members also had the option of issuing a “yellow card” which would be a warning as to future conduct and ... view the full minutes text for item 39