Decision details
Public Footpath Copmanthorpe No 2 - Proposed closure of Level Crossing and footpath diversion – City of York Council objection to Network Rail’s application under the provisions of the Transport and Works Act 1992
Decision Maker: Chief Operating Officer
Decision status: Decision Made
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: No
Decision:
The Monitoring
Officer has confirmed this decision can be made by the Chief
Operating Officer using their urgency powers to oppose the order.
This is needed because the deadline for submission of an objection
to the DfT expires very shortly this week (17th May) and full
Council will not meet before the deadline.
The decision has been agreed with the Leader of the Labour Group
and Leader Elect.
Network Rail has applied to the Secretary of State for Transport
for an Order under the Transport and Works Act 1992 to authorise
the closure of an existing pedestrian level crossing and the
diversion of the existing public footpath (part of the Ebor Way)
currently running over the level crossing by means of a new stepped
footbridge at Yorkfield Lane. These proposals are part of Network
Rail’s Transpennine Route Upgrade (TRU) Programme.
When considered from the junction of Farmer’s Way and
Ploughman’s Close, the proposed diversion route will increase
the length of the public right of way (footpath) route between
Copmanthorpe and Bishopthorpe (where the footpath meets
Copmanthorpe Lane) by approximately 200m, from 1.6km currently, to
1.8km using the diversion route. The proposed diversion route will
include a stepped bridge to take users over the railway line.
For users who are not able to use the proposed stepped bridge,
alternative routes available between Copmanthorpe and Bishopthorpe
would be:
• the road network and cycle route to the north for approx.
3.9 km, namely Tadcaster Road and the Sustrans cycle route
(National Cycle Route 65); or
• the road network to the south for approx. 4.8km, namely
Station Road, Temple Lane (footway provision stops after number 61
Temple Lane when travelling from Copmanthorpe to Bishopthorpe) and
Appleton Road (no footways available).
The decision taken by the Executive Member for Transport on 14
March 2023 (available here:
https://democracy.york.gov.uk/ieDecisionDetails.aspx?ID=6816) was
to delegate authority to the Director for Environment, Transport
and Planning in consultation with the Executive Member for
Transport, in accordance with paragraphs 15 or 16 of this report
(as the case may be), to:
a) formulate and submit an objection to the TWA Order; or
b) formulate and submit a representation in support of the TWA
Order; or
c) submit a representation that neither supports nor objects to the
TWA Order i.e. effectively adopt a neutral position with no
positive case in relation to the principle of the TWA Order.
This was because a decision would likely need to be made within the
pre-election period.
Therefore the decision is that City of York Council will submit an
objection to Network Rail’s application on the following
grounds:
a) The proposal removes accessibility for those with protected
characteristics and builds in discrimination by prohibiting access
for those with protected characteristics. The proposed stepped
footbridge will preclude some users with protected characteristics
under the Equality Act 2010 (age, disability, pregnancy and
maternity) from using the crossing over the railway line and
Footpath 2 once it is diverted and the proposals raise concerns for
the personal safety of future users as the bridge will be
“unlit and enclosed”. Network Rail’s initial
application to divert the footpath (submitted under Section 119A of
the Highways Act 1980) was refused on these grounds by the
Executive Member for Transport’s at the 17 May 2022 decision
session (available here:
https://democracy.york.gov.uk/ieDecisionDetails.aspx?ID=6534)
b) In the application submitted to the Secretary of State under the
provisions of the Transport and Works Act 1992, Network Rail has
not demonstrated how the organisation’s duties under the
Equality Act 2010, and specifically under the Public Sector
Equality Duty, have been considered with regard to the proposed
diversion route and stepped bridge.
c) The proposals have not adequately considered the needs of the
future residents of the proposed housing development on the field
lying to the south of and adjacent to No. 1 Tadcaster Road,
Copmanthorpe. Outline planning permission (18/00680/OUTM) has been
granted for this site for the erection of 158 dwellings. The site
is likely to include a significant proportion of larger family
houses and the footpath off Yorkfield Lane will provide direct
access to the public right of way between the site and
Bishopthorpe, although this will be limited to residents who can
use steps, excluding some families with young children and people
living with a disability or mobility issues, if the current
proposals are implemented.
TWA application documents supplied by Network Rail, available here:
https://www.networkrail.co.uk/running-the-railway/railway-upgrade-plan/key-projects/transpennine-route-upgrade/copmanthorpe-level-crossing/
Options Considered:
As per the report presented to the Executive
Member for Transport on 14/03/23, three options were considered to
formulate CYC’s response to Network Rail’s application
under the provisions of the Transport and Works Act 1992:
a) object to the TWA Order; or
b) support the TWA Order; or
c) neither support nor object to the TWA Order i.e. effectively
adopt a neutral position with no positive case in relation to the
principle of the TWA Order.
Options Rejected:
Options b and c have been rejected.
Publication date: 15/05/2023
Date of decision: 15/05/2023