Decision details

Consideration of objections received for 2020 Annual Review of Traffic Regulation Order Requests

Decision Maker: Decision Session - Executive Member for Transport - Expired, Executive Member for Transport

Decision status: Decision Made

Is Key decision?: No

Is subject to call in?: Yes

Purpose:

Purpose of Report: Consider the objections received following the advertisement of the 2020 Annual Review of Traffic Regulation Order proposals.

The Executive Member will be asked to consider the objections received from residents and officer recommendations before deciding whether or not to approve the orders.

Decision:

Resolved:

 

                      i.         That the following decisions relating to the traffic regulations order requests (Agenda Item 4) be implemented:

a.   Danebury Drive implement a lesser restriction than advertised as outlined in Annex A and include a 15 meter double yellow lines on north and south side of Rosedale Avenue at junction with Danebury Drive;

b.   Lidgett Grove/Beckfield Lane Junction implement a lesser restriction than advertised as outlined in Annex A;

c.   Plantation Drive implement as advertised;

d.   Copmanthorpe Lane/Appleton Road implement as advertised;

e.   Copmanthorpe Lane no further action;

f.     Acaster Lane and Main Street Junction implement a lesser restriction than advertised as outlined in Annex B;

g.   The Courtyard no further action;

h.   Canon’s Court implement as advertised;

i.     Clifton Dale implement as advertised;

j.     The Square implement as advertised;

k.   Chalfonts implement as advertised;

l.     Orchard Way/North Lane Junction implement as advertised;

m. Broadway implement a lesser restriction than advertised as outlined in Annex E and to write to those that will no longer have double yellow lines outside homes be written to about whether they would wish to have white bar markings;

n.   Fulford Road that a decision be delegated to the Director for Environment, Transport, and Planning to allow for Officers to confirm that Grange Garth parking bays would also be community parking bays before implementing;

o.   St. Mary’s and Frederic Street, R12: GM Parking Bays to complete a further review of the whole R12 zone with a view to all bays within the zone becoming Community Bays;

p.   South Lane no further action;

q.   Greenshaw Drive implement as advertised;

r.     Westfield Lane/Green Dike and Plantation Way Junction implement a lesser restriction than advertised with 8 meter restrictions on Plantation Way north and south side;

s.   Village Garth and The Village Junction implement as advertised;

t.     Glen Road/Harcourt Street implement as advertised;

u.   Monkton Road/Elmfield Avenue implement as advertised;

v.   Seventh Avenue implement as advertised;

w.  Elmfield Terrace/Stray Garth implement as advertised;

x.   Springfield Avenue/Beech Avenue implement as advertised;

y.   Severus Avenue/York Road junction take no further action;

z.   Acomb Road implement a lesser restriction than advertised as outlined in Annex J;

aa.              Thief Lane/Tandem Place implement as advertised;

bb.              Moore Avenue/Osbaldwick Lane take no further action until residents petition has been considered;

cc. Yearsley Crescent do not implement and advertise the restrictions on the other side of the street as residents and Ward Councillors have requested;

dd.              Nunthorpe Road take no further action until further consultation with Ward Councillors;

ee.              Scarcroft Road implement a lesser restriction than advertised as outlined in Annex M and a review of hours of operation of the residents parking zone R48;

ff.   Landalewood Road implement as advertised;

gg.              Oriel Grove/Rawcliffe Drive implement as advertised;

hh.              Millfield Lane implement as advertised;

ii.    Glebe Close take no further action;

jj.    Askham Croft implement as advertised;

kk. Askham Lane/Grange Lane implement as advertised;

ll.    Gale Lane no further action;

mm.           Dalton Hill/Main Street implement as advertised.

 

Reason:     To ensure that appropriate changes are made to traffic

restrictions to address concerns raised.

Report author: Geoff Holmes

Publication date: 22/03/2022

Date of decision: 22/03/2022

Decided at meeting: 22/03/2022 - Decision Session - Executive Member for Transport - Expired

Effective from: 25/03/2022

Accompanying Documents:

 

Feedback
Back to the top of the page