Agenda item
Consideration of representations received to the advertised R30 extended Residents Priority Parking scheme for East Parade
- Meeting of Decision Session - Executive Member for Transport - Expired, Tuesday, 17 May 2022 10.00 am (Item 69.)
- View the background to item 69.
To consider the formal representations received to the legal Traffic Regulation Order, advertised during May 2021, to implement an extension of R30 resident’s priority parking scheme to include the eastern section of East Parade, this incorporated properties located on East Parade between Eastern Terrace and Melrosegate, Bull Lane and Parade Court and determine what action is appropriate.
Decision:
Resolved:
i. No further action is taken in relation to the advertised resident’s priority parking scheme on East Parade. In addition it is recommended that approval be given to implement the advertised No Waiting Restrictions (double yellow lines) on East Parade at the entrance to Parade Court only. The No Waiting restrictions to be implemented are annotated in Annex A, along with the advertised proposed residents parking scheme in Annex B.
Reason: To acknowledge residents objections and comments received from both, within the advertised affected area of East Parade and nearby adjoining streets, who would all be disadvantaged by the proposals. Previous responses for the whole area were against the introduction of a scheme and the received representations confirms the existing thoughts of residents relating to implementing restrictions on a partial area.
The no waiting restrictions either side of Parade Court provide the necessary junction protection for safety when vehicles are entering and exiting the junction and maintain a visibility splay for drivers vision of oncoming vehicles.
Minutes:
The proposed extension of the R30 residents priority parking scheme was discussed and it was confirmed that following the nearby streets voting against extending the scheme, lots of residents of East Parade had raised objections to being included within the scheme. The Executive Member agreed to take no further action as adding one street would not address commuter parking in the area. He did support however, the restrictions on the junction to address safety concerns. Wider issues raised in public participation such as speeding issues the Executive Member recommended residents discuss these issues with Ward Councillors.
Resolved:
i. No further action is taken in relation to the advertised resident’s priority parking scheme on East Parade. In addition it is recommended that approval be given to implement the advertised No Waiting Restrictions (double yellow lines) on East Parade at the entrance to Parade Court only. The No Waiting restrictions to be implemented are annotated in Annex A, along with the advertised proposed residents parking scheme in Annex B.
Reason: To acknowledge residents objections and comments received from both, within the advertised affected area of East Parade and nearby adjoining streets, who would all be disadvantaged by the proposals. Previous responses for the whole area were against the introduction of a scheme and the received representations confirms the existing thoughts of residents relating to implementing restrictions on a partial area.
The no waiting restrictions either side of Parade Court provide the necessary junction protection for safety when vehicles are entering and exiting the junction and maintain a visibility splay for drivers vision of oncoming vehicles.
Supporting documents:
- Exec Member Decision R30 extension, item 69. PDF 204 KB View as HTML (69./1) 56 KB
- Annex A - Parade Court, item 69. PDF 707 KB
- Annex B - East Parade proposed ResPark, item 69. PDF 383 KB
- Annex C - original Consultation Area, item 69. PDF 448 KB
- Annex D - East Parade comments, item 69. PDF 304 KB
- Annex E - First Avenue comments, item 69. PDF 273 KB
- Annex F - Second Avenue comments, item 69. PDF 258 KB
- Annex G - Main Avenue Comments, item 69. PDF 103 KB
- Annex H - Parade Court, item 69. PDF 279 KB
- Annex I - Councillor Comments, item 69. PDF 247 KB